cm0002@piefed.world to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 1 day agoFeel old yet?lemmy.mlimagemessage-square54fedilinkarrow-up1731arrow-down14 cross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1727arrow-down1imageFeel old yet?lemmy.mlcm0002@piefed.world to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square54fedilink cross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
minus-squareu/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·15 hours agoThey were floppy though? At least 8 inch, and 5.25 inch. 3.5 only on the inside (unless enough force is applied xD).
minus-squarenyan@lemmy.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down3·14 hours agoThe larger ones were flexible, not floppy—they could be bent without cracking the casing, but wouldn’t just bend under their own weight.
minus-squareleftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·7 minutes agoIf you held them by a side and shaked them, they were definitely floppy.
They were floppy though?
At least 8 inch, and 5.25 inch. 3.5 only on the inside (unless enough force is applied xD).
By 3.5" you ofc mean:
/s
The larger ones were flexible, not floppy—they could be bent without cracking the casing, but wouldn’t just bend under their own weight.
If you held them by a side and shaked them, they were definitely floppy.