∃∀λ@programming.dev to Wikipedia@lemmy.worldEnglish · 6 months agoHouses are for living, not for speculationen.wikipedia.orgexternal-linkmessage-square38fedilinkarrow-up1244arrow-down15cross-posted to: wikipedia@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1239arrow-down1external-linkHouses are for living, not for speculationen.wikipedia.org∃∀λ@programming.dev to Wikipedia@lemmy.worldEnglish · 6 months agomessage-square38fedilinkcross-posted to: wikipedia@lemmy.ml
minus-squaredylanmorgan@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14arrow-down5·6 months agoRemember when Mao executed landlords? He seemed crazy at the time.
minus-squareMotoAsh@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up24arrow-down3·edit-25 months agodeleted by creator
minus-squareayyy@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down5·6 months agoDo you truly, actually, believe that the reign of Mao was a net positive?
minus-squaredylanmorgan@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·6 months agoNo, just that his stance on landlords may be worth revisiting. Adam Smith was also anti-landlord, FWIW.
minus-squareNuclearDolphin@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·6 months agoMao wasn’t even the one who executed landlords. He just never really cracked down on the pissed off serfs running kangaroo courts on the people who wronged them.
Remember when Mao executed landlords?
He seemed crazy at the time.
deleted by creator
Do you truly, actually, believe that the reign of Mao was a net positive?
No, just that his stance on landlords may be worth revisiting.
Adam Smith was also anti-landlord, FWIW.
Mao wasn’t even the one who executed landlords. He just never really cracked down on the pissed off serfs running kangaroo courts on the people who wronged them.