• taiyang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Yeah, that tracks with what I see, at least. Either it’s used as an excuse for layoffs that likely would happen anyway given the market, or they’re just included in a workflow without firing (the US was already in bad shape after COVID, with tech companies already laying off people they over-hired during lockdown)

    I’ve got a friend who pays under the table to a guy to write and edit instructional videos, and still does that since there’s never enough videos to produce for her project. Just, now, the guy uses AI in his workflow and… I’d say maybe produces at about the same pace (fact checking the AI takes time, lol).

    But basically, AI didn’t replace her copy writer / editor, they just scaled up (or at least, attempted to, lol).

    • HubertManne@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I think ai was not just an excuse and that they layed off thinking they could somehow make it up with ai.