Redditsux@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 2 months ago'Never felt more betrayed': MAGA rebels over Trump's 'treasonous' Qatar base in Idahowww.rawstory.comexternal-linkmessage-square163fedilinkarrow-up1722arrow-down113
arrow-up1709arrow-down1external-link'Never felt more betrayed': MAGA rebels over Trump's 'treasonous' Qatar base in Idahowww.rawstory.comRedditsux@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 2 months agomessage-square163fedilink
minus-squarePennomi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17·2 months agoAI are propaganda machines, check its sources before believing it
minus-squareNoxy@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down1·2 months agohow does one even know and verify what an LLM’s “sources” are? wouldn’t it just vomit out whatever response and then find “sources” that happen to match its stupid output after the fact?
minus-squarePennomi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 months agoPrecisely my point. But if it is correct and can link to an authoritative source (eg. a news article), that is relatively easy to verify. How much you can trust a news article is still up for debate.
minus-squareNoxy@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 months agoso then all the value it brings is the exact same thing search engines have already been doing for decades.
minus-squarePennomi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·2 months agoIndeed, not very useful as a search tool IMO
minus-squareINHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·2 months agoAsk for the source and read it I suppose?
minus-squareNoxy@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoso then all the value it brings is the exact same thing search engines have already been doing for decades.
minus-squareBone@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·2 months agoSure, but where are the sources saying it’s true what OP stated? It seems harder to prove a rumor.
minus-squarePennomi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·2 months agoAgreed, I’m more worried about people blindly trusting AI than I am about this particular situation.
AI are propaganda machines, check its sources before believing it
how does one even know and verify what an LLM’s “sources” are? wouldn’t it just vomit out whatever response and then find “sources” that happen to match its stupid output after the fact?
Precisely my point. But if it is correct and can link to an authoritative source (eg. a news article), that is relatively easy to verify.
How much you can trust a news article is still up for debate.
so then all the value it brings is the exact same thing search engines have already been doing for decades.
Indeed, not very useful as a search tool IMO
Ask for the source and read it I suppose?
so then all the value it brings is the exact same thing search engines have already been doing for decades.
Sure, but where are the sources saying it’s true what OP stated? It seems harder to prove a rumor.
Agreed, I’m more worried about people blindly trusting AI than I am about this particular situation.