President backs Cuomo in election eve Truth Social post as Mamdani hits back at Trump’s ‘threat – it is not the law’

On the eve of New York’s well-watched mayoral election, Donald Trump issued a threat to its voters: stop Zohran Mamdani or pay.

“If Communist Candidate Zohran Mamdani wins the Election for Mayor of New York City, it is highly unlikely that I will be contributing Federal Funds, other than the very minimum as required, to my beloved first home,” Trump said in a post on Truth Social. “I don’t want to send, as President, good money after bad.”

Trump’s comments echo those broadcast on Sunday during his appearance on CBS’s 60 minutes, in which he said: “It’s gonna be hard for me as the president to give a lot of money to New York, because if you have a communist running New York, all you’re doing is wasting the money you’re sending there.”

  • greenbit@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    it’s interesting to see how the lemmy users handle this communist lib vs trump being a friend of China and Russia alignment

    • MBech@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Well first of all, Mamdani isn’t communist. He’s more in line with a democratic socialist.

      Second, Russia isn’t communist, they’re fascist. China is very mich a capitalist country, which means they can not be communist. I don’t know exactly what they are, but they’re definately authoritarian, something Mamdani isn’t at all.

  • Taleya@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    16 hours ago

    doesn’t NY already pay more than it’s ever received? Guess it’s time to reserve some for the home team

    • Alfredolin@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Yeah wtf. These are not just “funds”. They are taxes. Payed by the people. The one who voted.

  • Wilco@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is impeachable … par fot the course with Trump and MAGA. So sick of injustice.

    • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      how many times do you think any other president would have been successfully impeached for trump’s roll of crime? 50? 100 times?

      to me, the confidential docs debacle and j6 are the worst of the worst; the docs one stings especially because I know what it takes to obtain and maintain a security clearance and wonder how much he put at risk - both human assets and strategic plans - in his fucking bathroom - knowing that similar behavior in the military would get you a nice stretch at leavenworth federal correctional facility and you might see freedom in a few decades. maybe.

      dems should enumerate the list and use it any time someone talks about presidential fitness. “Oh you’re worried about a woman president, but this fuck did treason after treason and that’s fine?”

      • Azhad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        For what the world understood you impeached a president because he lied about receiving head, I guess the two parties are indeed different.

  • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 days ago

    The billionaires don’t want you to know this but you pay taxes to the states your business is located in. You don’t just “leave” because taxes. The businesses these billionaires own in New York are still subject to taxes.

    What’s crazy is the right has “donated” more money to supporting cuomo than Mamdani would have even taxed them.

    • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Businesses already set up headquarters in Delaware for tax reasons. They’re not going to leave New York City, one of biggest markets on Earth. This argument from conservatives was always stupid.

  • Jaysyn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 days ago

    Trump has a lot of property in New York.

    Sure would be a shame if he finally saw some consequences and lost a few dozen of them.

  • altkey (he\him)@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    2 days ago

    I may be wrong, but isn’t NYC more of a money generator than it’s a receiver? If that’s so, I don’t see how NYC would suffer, but it would widen the divide between such areas and poor dotational ones, making their people possible maga recruits.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      There is still a system in place where states contribute their federal taxes before that revenue is used for whatever we have budgeted. A state doesn’t take “their share” first, and states depend on federal funding for a lot of projects and services.

      That said, a state with large surpluses can probably write policies to use their state taxes to pay for federal programs that people want to keep, but that’s a snarled-up and anti-american system, the taxes are supposed to be used for the people, not be used like a cudgel to enforce political partisanship. There would be a lot of courts who would challenge this, which still might go in Trump’s favor because of his corruption of the judicial branch, but that’s a LOT of work and expense for something that isn’t going to actually get the administration anything but ire from the citizens of one of the country’s world’s largest, most prominent cities.

      Largely, this is as usual, a massive pile of bullshit meant to fit into a right-wing news site’s headline ticker, because people largely don’t read stories, they just read headlines and don’t question it. This kind of rhetoric has always been about making his most powerful asset, his ludicrously stupid and armed and fanatical base feel like he’s still big strong daddy choking everyone.

  • betanumerus@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    djt wouldn’t be able to name the communist countries in the world to save his life. It is a very anti-American behavior to label half of Americans as enemies. The US totally includes an opposition party. Idiot still doesn’t understand what a democracy is and how to stay in his lane.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    123
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’d love to see NYC set up a voluntary escrow account for federal taxes.

    You don’t have to pay shit till taxes are due, have NYC sit on their withholdings and trump won’t be able to build any ballrooms.

        • pineapple_pizza@lemmy.dexlit.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          2 days ago

          You have to pay quarterly if your withholding doesn’t match you tax burdon. That’s oversimplified but in general you cannot wait till tax day or else everyone would. You would just self withhold, leave the cash in a safe money market fund and make 4% on it till tax day.

          • acchariya@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            2 days ago

            Illegal if a few thousand people do it, but defacto legal if a few million people do it.

            We need a 2025 word for illegal things getting a pass due to systemic chaos in the same way we had truthyness in the early 2000s. I propose “derelegal” to mean technically illegal but unenforced due to systemic chaos or legal rot.

            • Serinus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              19
              ·
              2 days ago

              It does for us plebs.

              An in-group that the law protects but does not bind, and an out-group that the law binds but does not protect.

          • Septimaeus@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            If withholding doesn’t match tax burden

            AND difference exceeds the $1500 quarterly buffer. That is, you only owe penalties if your withholding is more-than-a-little off in your favor.

            I mention that because it’s an important detail for a useful tip re: filling w-4s. Since the withholding percentage is just an estimate based on that form, including the number of allowances you specify, it’s usually a good idea to “tune” that number to prevent over-withholding and, preferably, err somewhat in your favor.

            It’s better to owe taxes on your return. If the IRS owes you, it means you inadvertently gave them an interest-free loan last year.

          • pineapple_pizza@lemmy.dexlit.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            On second thought. Pretty sure you need to withhold too, otherwise you just do the same thing per quarter. If someone knows, please let me know so I can turn off withholding lol

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Those are called “withholdings” and you pick what they are on your W4…

        And honestly everyone should know that, literally every legal job in America you fill out a W4…

  • DeICEAmerica@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 days ago

    Whenever these fucks try and paint Americans as terrorists and threaten to cut off anything they create monsters they can’t control. Anyone he attacks becomes wildly popular and almost assures them victory. Especially if he has his thugs come rough them up.

    Fuck you cancer. You take far too many good people while skipping this piece of shit.

    • YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      What if trump is actually a secret good person and is aware of his meirdas touch and is actually trying to make the world a better place by attacking the people trying to make it better, therefore assuring their victory.

      I mean he obviously isn’t, but it’s a nice thought.

      • Soup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Doing it this way would make him the dumbest person imaginable, though. We already know there is evil in the world, championing it does nothing but feed it.

    • LanguageIsCool@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      This is what’s happening. We all get riled up saying NY contributes more to the federal government than it receives so Trump needs NY more than it needs Trump. Which may be true, but the reality is that Trump is trying to dissuade voters.

  • Idk man, I see a lot of red caps at a certain party’s rallies

    red = obvious communist symbolism

    I think those caps even say “make america great again” which obviously sounds like a communist slogan

    I’d say we arrest these filthy communists 😏

    • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      sounds like a communist slogan

      I’ve always been amused by the fact that “gung ho” (which in Mandarin means “pull together”, as in pulling on a rope in unison) started out as a slogan of the Chinese Communist Party under Mao and then migrated to the US during WWII because of an openly-communist Marine. Its real meaning is more like “be a team player” but it was somehow transformed into “eagerly shoot brown people”.

      Also, the Marines’ “ooh rah” chant sounds exactly like the Soviet Red Army’s chant. More weird shit.

      • “gung ho” (which in Mandarin means “pull together”, as in pulling on a rope in unison)

        I’m a native Mandarin speaker and I’m so confused what ur talking about lolz.

        You mean like 共和? “together in unison/harmony” aka: “republicanism”?

        • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gung_ho

          The wikipedia article doesn’t mention the “pull together” (as in rope pulling) interpretation. That was from a book about Mao that I read a long time ago, I can’t remember what it was. The book had a bit about Evans Carlson traveling with Mao’s army and meeting him. I am certainly not a Chinese speaker so I’m happy to have my inaccuracies corrected.

          • Sounds like a borrowed term from a random word converted into English. I wasn’t aware there were any nationwide propaganda slogan related to it, looks like just some random slogan from a state-owned organization.