• Integrate777@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    It’s fucking weird people have such strong opinions about issues like X11 and systemd. They’re meant to be working in the background away from the user, and that’s exactly how I treat them. Actually systemd still provides some functions a user might have to interact with manually, for X11 I’m just baffled.

    When I take an uber, I don’t care whether the car has an automatic or manual transmission.

    • embed_me@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      I used to use some features that only worked on x11. Slowly I found alternatives or workarounds on wayland. So I understand the sentiment. Imagine you book an uber but it’s electric so they say you can’t book a ride that’s too long

      • dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        I love your metaphor because it is exactly the kind of pedantry that is usually at play with X11 vs Wayland.

        “I can’t take an electric uber because it has an effective range less than 400 miles!”

        Who the fuck takes a uber to a destination over 4 hours away?

        A normal person rents a car, takes a bus, catches a train or buys a plane ticket. Ain’t no one faring a uber for a long trip to another city. But that’s exactly the kind of complaints from people obsessively clinging to X11. They have a hyper specific use case or workflow that almost no one else uses.

        • thatonecoder@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          Every single person has different problems and priorities, and until hyper specific use cases/workflows work on Wayland, many will stay on Xorg.

          • dustyData@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            9 days ago

            I understand and agree. Anyone who has a super specific use case that means they still use X11, go ahead, no one is stopping them. But to complain or trash Wayland on that basis is asinine. Every single change in paradigm breaks someone’s workflow, that’s impossible to avoid. But the responsible thing to do is to adapt either with new tools and resources, or with a slight change in workflow. They act like people are taking away their toy, when in reality it is just adding to the pile of available toys. But they are upset because their toy is old and won’t get repaired anymore, while the new toy is slightly different but a bit easier to clean and repair, so they get upset at the other kids for playing with it. Ignoring that the new toy doesn’t make the old toy disappear.

            • thatonecoder@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 days ago

              The problem is many distros are going to stop shipping Xorg, because it is “not needed” anymore.

              • urandom@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 days ago

                You should be able to compile it yourself though, even if upstream doesn’t provide it prepackaged

    • rtxn@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      In my eyes, it’s the same deal as conservatives coping with the changing world. There is a version where they just shut up and let the rest of the tech landscape improve while they happily stick to the X they know (X.org or even XLibre).