The Democrats were furious Monday over eight senators who caved to support a deal to end the government shutdown that does not include the Affordable Care Act subsidies their party had spent weeks fighting for.

The offending lawmakers include Democratic Senators Dick Durbin, Tim Kaine, Jacky Rosen, John Fetterman, Catherine Cortez Masto, Maggie Hassan, Jeanne Shaheen, and independent Senator Angus King, who claimed that they’d ensured a Senate vote on extending the tax credits. Their capitulation comes after House Speaker Mike Johnson insisted for weeks that he wouldn’t promise them a vote on anything, and even if he does follow through with a vote, it’s unlikely such a measure will pass the House.

Democratic lawmakers slammed their colleagues for forfeiting health care coverage for an estimated 5.1 million Americans by 2034 and increasing premiums across the marketplace.

Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders railed against the deal while speaking before the Senate Sunday. “If this vote succeeds, over 20 million Americans are gonna see at least a doubling in their premiums in the Affordable Care Act,” he said. “For certain groups of people, it will be a tripling and a quadrupling of their premiums. There are people who will now be paying 50 percent of their limited incomes for health care. Does anybody in the world think that makes sense?”

  • theparadox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    They may have been “protecting” the filibuster. If Republicans removed the filibuster, it would pave the way for Democrats to do the same thing. If Democrats were to lose the excuse of the Republican filibuster stopping them from passing legislation, they’d be forced to reveal that there are many more fucking disingenuous pieces of shit just like Manchin and Sinema ready to tank progressive legislation.

      • stinky@redlemmy.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        That feels like a convenient and simple viewpoint. It must be easy for you.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          It’s a conclusion I’ve drawn from decades of behavior. No, it’s not even remotely easy because the people who would crawl over used heroin needles to drink the bilge water from manchin’s houseboat keep gaslighting and employing other methods of abuse against those who disagree with them from the left. There is no one who disagrees with them to the right.

          From a functional standpoint, there is no democratic party.

          • stinky@redlemmy.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Everyone has decades of experience with human behavior. Yours is no more valuable than anyone else’s, so it’s not a valid support of your argument.

            Your opinion is easy because it’s simple and convenient. For people facing harder realities, their opinions will vary, and that’s ok. Those opinions are valid.

            Peace and blessings.

            • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Everyone has decades of experience with human behavior. Yours is no more valuable than anyone else’s, so it’s not a valid support of your argument.

              There is no argument that supports any criticism of democrats as far as you’re concerned.

              Your opinion is easy because it’s simple and convenient.

              Sometimes, things are simple.

              For people facing harder realities, their opinions will vary, and that’s ok.

              “If you have a different opinion from my unconditional worship of the democratic party, it’s because you have it easy, not because your experience is valid.”

              • stinky@redlemmy.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                I never said your experience was invalid. I’m sorry but whoever trained you in rhetoric missed the mark completely. I’d ask for a refund, assuming you paid for it.

                • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  I never said your experience was invalid.

                  Sure you didn’t. Just that mine’s not worth anything and those of people whose opinions match your own are valid.

                  I’m sorry but whoever trained you in rhetoric missed the mark completely. I’d ask for a refund, assuming you paid for it.

                  I’m sorry centrists think “gaslighting” and “debate” are synonyms.