A federal bankruptcy court judge on Friday said he would approve OxyContin-maker Purdue Pharma’s latest deal to settle thousands of lawsuits over the toll of opioids that includes some money for thousands of victims of the epidemic.

The deal overseen by US bankruptcy judge Sean Lane would require some of the multibillionaire members of the semi-reclusive Sackler family who own the company to contribute up to $7bn and give up ownership of the Connecticut-based firm.

The new agreement replaces one the US supreme court rejected last year, finding it would have improperly protected members of the family against future lawsuits. The judge said he would explain his decision in a hearing on Tuesday.

  • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    But what is the point of living if there’s no quality of life?

    What is the point if you don’t?

    The doctor has a valid moral claim not to promote deadly addictions.

    The fact is under proper medical care and supervision they can be quite safe.

    They can, and the doctor is the most qualified person to make that assessment.

    I’m criticizing your undervaluation of the dangers & poor acknowledgement of the cultural causes of the opioid epidemic such as misguided thinking about pain promoted by the pain scales, influence & regulatory capture by pain associations & pharmaceutical industries of medical policymakers to pressure physicians, campaigns popularizing myths. Competent doctors then & to this day found it all ridiculous & mostly disregard the pain scales: they rely on patient history & background, knowledge of their medical conditions, patient conversation.

    Some pain is untreatable, and there is something to the idea that focus amplifies pain, moderation & acceptance lessen it.

    But the problem is the prescriber that did an unsafe protocol, and the company that paid them to do it.

    That’s not how it works or the physician was incompetent.