I mean I guess you could include fetuses, but they aren’t actually part of the mother’s body, and would already count on their own, so while “skeletons inside” is a truthful statistic to include fetuses for, they don’t add limbs so counting them seems dishonest for this one.
Statistically, a human has fewer than two arms, two legs, or two eyes.
Is there really more people missing limbs than with child?
I mean I guess you could include fetuses, but they aren’t actually part of the mother’s body, and would already count on their own, so while “skeletons inside” is a truthful statistic to include fetuses for, they don’t add limbs so counting them seems dishonest for this one.
…and more than two nipples.
The average human has one boob
If you ignore man-boobs, sure.
But fewer than how many fingers, is the real question (that I couldn’t actually find an answer for).