So I saw this little gem on a job posting. I’m curious, 1) is this legal based on how it’s phrased and 2) what regulation would prevent pay disclosure like this?

However, due to regulatory requirements, we are only able to consider candidates who reside in U.S. states that do not currently mandate salary disclosure in job postings

This includes, but is not limited to: Texas, Florida, Missouri, Arizona, Indiana, North Carolina, and Wisconsin.

Candidates residing in California, Colorado, New York Illinois, Washington, or other states with active pay transparency laws will not be considered at this time

  • slazer2au@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    15 hours ago

    The regulation require pay disclosure which is why they refuse to hire anyone from those locations.

    • ElectricWaterfall@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I don’t see why they don’t post a salary range I’ve seen companies get past these laws simply by posting a huge range effectively making the transparency meaningless.

    • ramble81@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      The phrasing makes it sound like there’s a regulation preventing disclosure so they can’t post in states where a law says otherwise.

      • False@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Yeah, they’re intentionally being bring misleading about it. The regulation is that those states require disclosure, and they don’t want to comply

      • slazer2au@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        14 hours ago

        That is code for we will pay as little as possible to give execs more bonus for keeping employee costs down .