• sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Entirely seriously:

    Such as what exactly?

    … Developing… Snaps?

    Like, no, really, what do they do?

    Are they why GNOME devs are insufferable?

    • Fizz@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      You do not seriously think all canonical has done is snaps and Gnome.

      Is building one of the most popular linux desktop environments and distros not enough to sell a paid support package to the users who want it? I dont think thats unfair.

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        No, I was genuienly asking.

        Yep, they make a distro.

        Lots of orgs make distros.

        This isn’t a decade ago, when Ubuntu was … leagues more generally user friendly than most other distros.

        What do they do for the broader linux ecosystem, outside of their own distro, other than snaps?

        You said they contribute to the ecosystem.

        How do they do that?

        • bobo@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          They invented a solution to sell user data to Amazon, does that count?

          They also have a bunch of knock-off products like canonical aws, canonical terraform-ansible, canonical k8s, etc.

          This isn’t a decade ago, when Ubuntu was … leagues more generally user friendly than most other distros.

          It was crap a decade ago that’s why everyone was already installing mint, and only slightly less crap almost 2 decades ago. I installed Linux for the first time around 2006, and Ubuntu was no different than one of the first versions of opensuse. The whole “Ubuntu is for beginners” hype was literally all due to them sending free install CDs.

          • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Hah, fair enough, I was still a Linux n00b back in even 2012.

            I have tried to study the history I missed in retrospect, but it sounds like you just directly experienced it starting from an earlier point in time than I did.

            • bobo@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              I was still a Linux n00b back in even 2012.

              Oh so was I. During the early opensuse I was a teen playing with new toys after reading about Linux in a pc mag. I’ve only started seriously using Linux around 2010-2013.

        • Fizz@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Hardware support and working with manufacturers to bring linux support, vendor support bringing mainstream apps to linux, advertising linux laptops and getting it in front of people all around the world, Wayland, gnome, accessibility, a ton shit way to much to list. Just because the improvements are done for Ubuntu doesnt mean they arent useful on other distros. Its free software after all the rising tide lifts all boats. Canonical arent a huge mega corp raking in cash. They cant compare to giants like redhat.

          • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            I’ll grant you that they are not redhat, but again, tons of other teams behind other distros do some or all of what you just mentioned.

            And… almost all, if not nearly all of them, do not monetize their OS.

            Is… Canonical uniquely important, in some way?

            Poof them out of existence, and what, outside of their own direct projects, breaks?

      • bobo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        one of the most popular linux desktop environments and distros

        Oh you mean the DE they abandoned almost 10 years ago?

        Is selling user data to Amazon and harvesting data illegally from Azure VMs not enough for users to tell them to stick their terminal ads up their ass? I don’t think that’s unfair.

        • Fizz@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Fuck off Tankie, I will not fall for your concern trolling bait today.

          • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            I mean, I also dislike tankies, but simply having a .ml user account does not automatically make someone a tankie.

            Also, they’re not concern trolling.

            What they brought up is highly, directly relevant, and it also is not a hypothetical, its … just reality.

            I don’t think you know what ‘tankie’ or ‘concern trolling’ mean.

            • Fizz@lemmy.nz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              I know that guy is a crazy tankie, I’ve see him around. What he brought up is a bunch of shit intended to waste time. He doesnt care about any of those things so trying to argue is a waste of time and most of its untrue or misleading.

              • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 months ago

                … then just block him, if you don’t enjoy interacting with him?

                But also, nothing he’s said here is untrue or misleading.

                Its, again, also quite relevant to a discussion of Canonincal’s business practices and how they contribute to Linux more broadly.

                If you don’t know, about a decade ago, Canonical kind of fucked over GNOME, said they’d make their own DE, and then basically never did.

                Hence my earlier quip about Canonical being the reason GNOME devs are… lets say, very strong willed.

                GNOME != Canonical.

                The only actual numbers I can find are that Canonical donates $120k a year to all other open source projects, but I can’t find any breakdown of how much of that $120k goes to GNOME, or what those projects are.

                … This is part of why I was asking if you could clarify for me, what it is that Canonical does exactly, in terms of helping out the Linux ecosystem.

            • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Oh, uh, that’s over at PopOS!, who are basically actually doing / trying to do what Canonical said they were gonna do, 5-10 years ago.