iamdisappoint@reddthat.com to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 19 hours agoIt was best as a silly toy language in the 1990's...reddthat.comimagemessage-square98fedilinkarrow-up1460arrow-down150
arrow-up1410arrow-down1imageIt was best as a silly toy language in the 1990's...reddthat.comiamdisappoint@reddthat.com to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 19 hours agomessage-square98fedilink
minus-squareFrankDeath@infosec.publinkfedilinkarrow-up1·5 hours agohttps://www.destroyallsoftware.com/talks/wat
minus-squarehperrin@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 hours agoYes, if you do silly things with JS, you generally get silly results instead of TypeErrors. I wouldn’t say that makes the language bad. It makes the language resilient to bad programming, which you’d generally want in the case of web pages.
https://www.destroyallsoftware.com/talks/wat
Yes, if you do silly things with JS, you generally get silly results instead of TypeErrors. I wouldn’t say that makes the language bad. It makes the language resilient to bad programming, which you’d generally want in the case of web pages.