• AeronMelon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 days ago

    Obviously, this is the only sane solution for a one-man team, but all game developers need to put their foot down and say “it’s ready when it’s ready.”

    No marketing deadlines, no “crunch time,” make the game until the game is made, release it, maintain it, do it again if you think you have a good idea.

    • darthelmet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      While I generally agree, I think there is some value in imposing some kind of deadline or limit to a project. Nothing is ever going to be perfect. There will always be more work that could be done on something. If you let yourself just keep going until you think it’s done it might never come out.

      But it’s a balance and when publishers push those kinds of deadlines they’re not really considering that.

    • iamthetot@piefed.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      That would be nice in a perfect world but bills need to be paid. I’m not defending crunch time, but not every project can afford to be “ready when it’s ready”. I don’t think many companies would survive like that.

        • SSTF@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          The above comments were talking about how this policy should apply to every game development project. Which is a nice thought, but not realistic for every situation.

          • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            Oh yes, I’m sure all those billion dollar companies would have all shut down by now if they had to wait a few weeks to put out a game. Putting out buggy unplayable shit was an absolute necessity.