I do not get why people on distros like Endevour or Cachy say that they use arch. It makes me cringe everytime. Be proud of your distro, they are all good.
I mean, if you’re on Fedora or CentOS, it’s basically Red Hat. Lots of such instances. Potato, po-tot-o.
Anyways, if a person uses Arch, is switching to Endeavor beneficial? Will it be more convenient or feel restrictive?
I’ve been in vanilla Arch for well over a year and have had a few challenges here and there. Really from Hyprland more than the OS. My mouse and touchpad are a nightmare and I just hotkey everything. Also there is a networking bug that took me 5 hours to get around recently. Saw lots of folks complaining about it, but I resolved it.
But no one has ever said they use redhat when they use centOS or fedora. That doesnt happen on other distros they just say the distro they use. Obviously its not a big deal but it is cringe and all the responses from people twisting themselves into knots trying to defend it is even more cringe.
Anyways, if a person uses Arch, is switching to Endeavor beneficial? Will it be more convenient or feel restrictive?
That depends, if you can configure arch then no because it will only add things you’ll want to remove. If you cant then its nice to have maintainers to configure and maintain your distro for you.
I just updated my OS and all my issues were from Hyprland working afterwards. I guess if the WM is going to be the issue every time, maybe I might try Sway or something rather than and an easier OS.
I do not get why people on distros like Endevour or Cachy say that they use arch. It makes me cringe everytime. Be proud of your distro, they are all good.
I mean, if you’re on Fedora or CentOS, it’s basically Red Hat. Lots of such instances. Potato, po-tot-o.
Anyways, if a person uses Arch, is switching to Endeavor beneficial? Will it be more convenient or feel restrictive?
I’ve been in vanilla Arch for well over a year and have had a few challenges here and there. Really from Hyprland more than the OS. My mouse and touchpad are a nightmare and I just hotkey everything. Also there is a networking bug that took me 5 hours to get around recently. Saw lots of folks complaining about it, but I resolved it.
But no one has ever said they use redhat when they use centOS or fedora. That doesnt happen on other distros they just say the distro they use. Obviously its not a big deal but it is cringe and all the responses from people twisting themselves into knots trying to defend it is even more cringe.
That depends, if you can configure arch then no because it will only add things you’ll want to remove. If you cant then its nice to have maintainers to configure and maintain your distro for you.
I just updated my OS and all my issues were from Hyprland working afterwards. I guess if the WM is going to be the issue every time, maybe I might try Sway or something rather than and an easier OS.