The Justice Department has charged a man who squirted apple cider vinegar on Democratic U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar at an event in Minneapolis, according to court papers made public Thursday.

The man arrested for Tuesday’s attack, Anthony Kazmierczak, faces a charge of forcibly assaulting, opposing, impeding and intimidating Omar, according to a complaint filed in federal court.

Authorities determined that the substance was water and apple cider vinegar, according to an affidavit. After Kazmierczak sprayed Omar with the liquid, he appeared to say, “She’s not resigning. You’re splitting Minnesotans apart,” the affidavit says. Authorities also say that Kazmierczak told a close associate several years ago that “somebody should kill” Omar, court documents say.

Kazmierczak has a criminal history and has made online posts supportive of Donald Trump, a Republican.

    • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Squirting an unidentifiable liquid in someone’s face is terrorism.

      Until it’s tested in a lab, no one knows what it is. It could be a strong acid, it could be a nerve agent. Neither of those things are unheard of, and either one can maim or kill in a matter of minutes.

      Using fear or violence to achieve a political purpose is the definition of terrorism. The attacker was attempting to disrupt the town hall and intimidate politicians in order to suppress political speech.

      It’s literal terrorism.

      • Basic Glitch@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        For real, I cannot imagine the insanely long list of charges if that had been a GOP member, every charge you could possibly pull out of your ass, multiplied by the number of people in the room/close proximity.

        You’re not going to get a terrorism charge based on apple cider vinegar.

        Too young to remember a post 9/11 America? People were getting hit with a terrorism/terroristic threat charge for way less than what this guy did.

      • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        Squirting an unidentifiable liquid in someone’s face is terrorism.

        It was identified as something harmless. Terrorism is the use of deadly violence on soft, civilian targets. Generally, assaults on political leaders are considered something else. Terrorism is the continued threat of future deadly violence, not of squirting vinegar on people.

        Until it’s tested in a lab, no one knows what it is.

        I don’t think a lab test was required to figure out it was harmless. It was vinegar.

        It could be a strong acid, it could be a nerve agent. Neither of those things are unheard of, and either one can maim or kill in a matter of minutes.

        Yeah, but it wasn’t. If someone hit one of those ICE thugs with a black water balloon that was indeed filled with harmless water, would you support charging the thrower with terrorism?

        Using fear or violence

        No, it’s using violence to create fear of future violence. That’s the literal definition. Your personal definition waters down “terrorism” to a ludicrous extent.

        • Madison420@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Violent, criminal acts committed by individuals and/or groups to further ideological goals stemming from domestic influences, such as those of a political, religious, social, racial, or environmental nature

          As per the FBI definition of domestic terrorism.

          It’s domestic terrorism, stop being obtuse.