This could be huge for vehicle design as a whole.

  • KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    16 days ago

    I’ll belive it when a lab has verified the batteries are actually solid state. The CEO appears to be a grifter and they had no battery prototypes on hand at CES? Smells awfully like a scam.

  • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    What is the point in a $37,000 bike with SS battery and 600km of range. ICE bikes get about 200km a tank. No one rides 600km a day on a naked sport bike. If the point of SS batteries is fast charging , then why carry around 33 KWhr of overpriced battery?

    This is a bike designed by non motorcyclists and marketed on numbers. 1000nm instant torque? That’s unrideable. 3.5 sec 0-60 is not fast for a motorcycle, so their math doesn’t even make sense. It’s just a bunch of numbers. 200kw charging? Who cares, and good luck finding a charger that will do that.

    Every premium price EV bike company has gone broke.

    • Tattorack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      16 days ago

      I think the bike exists to sell the battery. I’m getting a strong feeling there is no intention for the bike to be profitable, but rather as a proof that what they’re selling works by showcasing a real-world model that people can buy and drive.

      With their plans to out-scale Tesla in battery manufacturing, it seems to me that they’re hoping to capture deals with EV manufacturers.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      17 days ago

      Don’t worry, there’s no way it’ll do 600km outside of a perfect lab test. 200 km is more likely, maybe 300.

    • WanderWisley@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      17 days ago

      They have been trying to make the hubless wheel a futuristic thing for so long it’s technically retro now.

        • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 days ago

          Sure there is. There’s a value to some people to look different. That translates to dollars.

          There’s not a Performance advantage to a hubless wheel.

          • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            16 days ago

            Motorcycle buyers, especially sportbikes, don’t take kindly to bullshit. Hubless wheels are heavy, have more wear components and are pointlessly complex. But pointless complexity is a requirement in EVs to justify the overprice.

          • gnu@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            17 days ago

            Adding a bunch of unsprung weight is a poor decision when it comes to handling though, and that’s something pretty important in a motorbike that’s trying to do more than just low speed commuting. Such a design will also be putting a lot of vibration through the motor components which is not good for longevity. It’s more a case of going for the (admittedly distinctive) aesthetic rather than being sensible.

            • booly@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              17 days ago

              Makes me wonder about the wheel’s rotational inertia, too. In theory, a hubless wheel could be lower mass overall without the need for a center axle/hub and spokes connecting the outside to the center. But that’s all weight saved in the center of the wheel with lower effect on overall rotational inertia. Visually, the picture that makes the thumbnail in this post shows that the brake disc has to be further from the center of the wheel, which I imagine adds a lot more weight (more material necessary for the overall brake disc being a larger circle) and a lot more rotational inertia (further from the center).

              Maybe the whole design itself can save weight in certain places that make up for the weight added in other places. But I just have a ton of questions, and am overall pretty skeptical of the long term potential of this design.

              Looks cool, though, I guess.

  • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    17 days ago

    I think it’s irresponsible of the Verge to tout an electric motorcycle’s range as “up to 600km”. It’s absolute fantasy.

    I have an electric dirtbike and a gas bike. My gas bike has an 11.1 L tank and can go about 360km per tank.

    The highest actual range I’ve seen on an electric motorcycle is about 100km of mixed use (highway and city).

    Solid state batteries have the potential capability of having almost double the power density as lithium ion. So approx 200-300km (maybe).

    Pretty solid but doubling THAT is just dishonest and in no way going to happen. You’re claiming to have more power density than internal combustion. That’s just straight up dishonest.

      • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        It doesn’t matter. It’s a lie. Ideal conditions and driving the bike at 19km/h achieves that. How many people are going to be driving a top speed of 19km/h on a bike? Their stats are physically impossible given the hardware they’re stating and are relying on people with little knowledge of real world range on electric motorcycles or charge density of solid state vs lion

    • rumba@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 days ago

      Pulled the CC data from downsub, asked AI to summarize, then reviewed the CC to make sure it was accurate.

      It’s mostly fluff centered around data about a couple of new packs and claimed ranges.

      20 kWh Pack

      • Range: 350 km
      • Charging power: Up to 100 kW
      • Adds 200 km of range in 10 minutes

      30 kWh Solid‑State Pack

      • Range: 600 km on a single charge
      • Charging power: Up to 200 kW
      • Adds 300 km of range in under 10 minutes

      Claims to be largest motorcycle battery of its kind

      SO they’re decently large, can charge quickly, I’d be a bit surprised if they were getting those actual ranges in real-world scenarios.