• rglullis@communick.news
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    Surely you’re not saying they shouldn’t have had a Twitter presence

    No, they shouldn’t have a Twitter presence. All public institutions should require full authority over the domain used for mass communication.

      • rglullis@communick.news
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        How?

        Twitter is not a public place and has been looking more and more like the opposite of it. Nowadays you can not even go someone’s profile to browse their timeline without logging in.

        • palordrolap@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          @rglullis@communick.news @abeorch@friendica.ginestes.es

          It may not be a public place per se, but it is a place where a very large cohort of the general public go.

          Perhaps my analogy should have been “This is bit like saying that governments shouldn’t make announcements on television and radio stations not under government control.”

          The same logic applies there. Of course they should. A large cohort of the general public watch television and listen to the radio (less so these days in the age of the Internet, but people do still watch and listen there.).