Why is rule 6 specifically targeted at US politics?

  • Bluetreefrog@lemmy.world
    shield
    M
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    19 days ago

    Enough people have given good answers to this question, so I won’t bother repeating their explanations. It came about after a trial following the last US election and a community discussion led to the trial becoming permanent.

    I’m going to leave this post up as it’s not actually about US politics, but about how the asklemmy community wants it to work.

  • NateNate60@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    20 days ago

    If you have used Reddit for some time, you’ll have noticed an interesting trend: any large space where general content is allowed to be posted and which does not prohibit US politics, will generally become saturated with US politics.

    This happens to some degree on Lemmy as well. It’s because Americans are the largest national demographic group on the English-speaking portion of the Internet, and because American politics in general is extreme and garners a lot of attention from others. So if talking about it is allowed, it will usually become all that anyone ever wants to talk about, or at least it will appear that way in a space where popularity determines visibility.

    • cosmicrookie@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      Thanks. That makes a lot of sense

      I haven’t used Reddit for years but I could see what you mean from Lemmy too. I just hadn’t noticed such a specific targeting of limitations in rules before.

      • NateNate60@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        20 days ago

        Now that I think about it, I honestly think that Lemmy has suffered this more than Reddit. Reddit has a lot of various non-politics related content but Lemmy seems to be filled a lot more with political posts. I get that many people find that content interesting, but after a while, one tires of it.

        • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 days ago

          I think we’d all like to go back to the days when politics was only occasionally interesting.

          Shit, I want news to be boring again. I remember when there was just thirty minutes of national news power day from 6 to 6:30. Then local news, and then The Muppet Show to put the world back into proper context.

  • neidu3@sh.itjust.worksM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    20 days ago

    Probably because we want somewhere that isn’t flooded with whatever detestable thing trump last did or said. I’ve been meaning to put out feelers about revising the rule to “No current/recent politics”, but I’ve never gotten around to it.

      • asudox@lemmy.asudox.devM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        17 days ago

        Yes. The rule is “no US politics”, not “no politics”.

        As long as discussion of Venezuelan politics does not turn into or knowingly cause US political discussion, it will be fine. Let’s be honest here though. Given the current events, it will surely turn into one.