• nednobbins@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    So you don’t care that Larian isn’t harmed, you don’t care that the dev’s aren’t harmed, you don’t care that the consumer isn’t harmed.

    You just feel bad for Epic?

    • masterspace@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      What are you talking about? Larian loses 30% of every single dollar spent on their game.

      Of course that harms them.

      • nednobbins@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Do you think Larian’s management is also stupid?

        Any halfway decent GTM executive would have checked their distribution channel options and chosen the mix that makes them the most money, net of fees.

        Why would they pay for a service that harms them?

          • nednobbins@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            That would be how monopolies work. You realize that Steam doesn’t require exclusivity, right? You can get BG3 all over the place. When customers have choice between vendors it’s not a monopoly, even if they tend to make the same choice.

            • masterspace@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              If Larian didn’t list their game on Steam and subject themselves to Valve 30% mafia fee, they would get no sales because Valve has a monopoly.

              That is why they choose to keep paying Valve’s extortionate fee.

              Consumers keep using Steam because Steam’s terms of service prevent a developer from selling their.gsme cheaper on other stores, meaning that consumers never have incentive to buy it elsewhere.

              Valve is abusing their monopoly, which is why monopolies need regulation, the type of which Tim Sweeney is calling for.