This sort of commenter frustrates me. I understand that they don’t want to see negativity in the comment section, but they never offer any sort of positivity, just reprimand.
I’m saying there’s no value in adding doomer loser noise to the signal.
Adding a positive is positive, reducing a negative is also a positive. I’m reducing a negative by asking these helpless bleating losers to be less unhelpful and vocal.
I’m happy and open to having a positive and constructive conversation, but they don’t start with rude challenges
Adding a positive is positive, reducing a negative is also a positive. I’m reducing a negative by asking these helpless bleating losers to be less unhelpful and vocal.
Lol, telling someone who is claiming the solution is to convince people to vote a loser is positive?
I mean that’s just the truth… You can’t make changes to the organization of the executive branch without securing the support of both the executive and Congress.
Maybe instead of loosing your shit about people being looser doomers, you might just want to read a book about civics.
That’s literally what you’re saying.
Try providing actual plans.
This sort of commenter frustrates me. I understand that they don’t want to see negativity in the comment section, but they never offer any sort of positivity, just reprimand.
You’re assuming these commenters are acting in good faith. They typically aren’t.
I’m saying there’s no value in adding doomer loser noise to the signal.
Adding a positive is positive, reducing a negative is also a positive. I’m reducing a negative by asking these helpless bleating losers to be less unhelpful and vocal.
I’m happy and open to having a positive and constructive conversation, but they don’t start with rude challenges
Still not providing an actual plan.
When you get one, post it.
And I consider phrases like ‘doomer loser’ pretty rude.
ok
Lol, telling someone who is claiming the solution is to convince people to vote a loser is positive?
I mean that’s just the truth… You can’t make changes to the organization of the executive branch without securing the support of both the executive and Congress.
Maybe instead of loosing your shit about people being looser doomers, you might just want to read a book about civics.
You’re commenting on an edit, so I can excuse your tone, but you’re late to the party
Do you not stand by your edit, what’s the problem here?
You just can’t muster a rebuttal?
Lol, now that’s some weak loser shit. Why even respond if you don’t have anything to say that actually defends your claims?