schizoidman@lemmy.zip to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 12 hours agoJudge orders Anna’s Archive to delete scraped data; no one thinks it will complyarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square16fedilinkarrow-up1207arrow-down14file-textcross-posted to: piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
arrow-up1203arrow-down1external-linkJudge orders Anna’s Archive to delete scraped data; no one thinks it will complyarstechnica.comschizoidman@lemmy.zip to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 12 hours agomessage-square16fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
minus-squaredb2@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up43·11 hours agoCouldn’t they make an argument with that pointing out that they’re being unjustly targeted because they’re smaller and easier to pick on?
minus-squareSolacefromSilence@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up39·11 hours agoNo one cares if they’re small or unjustly picked on. If they want to beat the charges, they need to announce their own AI trained on the data.
minus-squaretempest@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·8 hours agoIt would make me laugh if they could train an LLM that could only regurgitate content verbatim
minus-squareDran@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·14 minutes agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Markov_chain Before the advent of AI, I wrote a slack bot called slackbutt that made Markov chains of random lengths between 2 and 4 out of the chat history of the channel. It was surprisingly coherent. Making an “llm” like that would be trivial.
minus-squareilinamorato@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·7 hours agoWell, it’s not an LLM, but “AI” doesn’t have a defined meaning, so from that perspective they kind of already did.
minus-squarepanda_abyss@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·10 hours agoWe’ve created a state of the art model in recall and training data idempotency!
minus-squareUnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·10 hours ago If they want to beat the charges, they need to announce their own AI trained on the data several billion in Series A investment funding.
Couldn’t they make an argument with that pointing out that they’re being unjustly targeted because they’re smaller and easier to pick on?
No one cares if they’re small or unjustly picked on. If they want to beat the charges, they need to announce their own AI trained on the data.
It would make me laugh if they could train an LLM that could only regurgitate content verbatim
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Markov_chain
Before the advent of AI, I wrote a slack bot called slackbutt that made Markov chains of random lengths between 2 and 4 out of the chat history of the channel. It was surprisingly coherent. Making an “llm” like that would be trivial.
Well, it’s not an LLM, but “AI” doesn’t have a defined meaning, so from that perspective they kind of already did.
We’ve created a state of the art model in recall and training data idempotency!
I hope they call it FUAI.