Around Europe, governments and institutions are seeking to reduce their use of digital services from U.S. Big Tech companies and turning to domestic or free alternatives. The push for “digital sovereignty” is gaining attention as the Trump administration strikes an increasingly belligerent posture toward the continent, highlighted by recent tensions over Greenland that intensified fears that Silicon Valley giants could be compelled to cut off access.

  • Akasazh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 hours ago

    When you go to court in person you enter a state sponsored building.

    When conversing with your lawyer you’re free to use whatever means if preferred to you.

      • Akasazh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        My point was that the court hearing is, by design, in an open forum hosted by the state. There is no supposed privacy to defend from the state. You being in a room (whether physical or digital) that is state controlled is not an issue there.

        Your communications with your counsel should be private, though and that method of communication should not be breachable by the state.

        So when you complain about using their facilities you are only correct in the latter sense.

        • _‌_反いじめ戦隊@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          court hearing is, by design, in an open forum hosted by the state.

          wtf, no, most cases are not open.

          digital) that is state controlled is not an issue there.

          Yeah, it is. Since the state owns the streams & recordings, they can edit an control the narratives to their wishes.


          Still evading state forced counsil electronic meetings, huh.