The rules are in its code. It was not designed with ethics in mind, it was designed to steal IP, fool people into thinking it’s AI, and be profitable for its creators. They wrote the rules, and they do not care about right or wrong unless it impacts their bottom line.
The issue is more that there aren’t rules. Given there are billions of parameters that define how these models work, there isn’t really a way to ensure that it cant produce unwanted content.
It must observe even these rules that it doesn’t understand. Like everybody.
It can’t, it’s software that needs a governing body to dictate the rules.
The rules are in its code. It was not designed with ethics in mind, it was designed to steal IP, fool people into thinking it’s AI, and be profitable for its creators. They wrote the rules, and they do not care about right or wrong unless it impacts their bottom line.
That’s the point, there has to be a human in the loop that sets explicit guard rails
The issue is more that there aren’t rules. Given there are billions of parameters that define how these models work, there isn’t really a way to ensure that it cant produce unwanted content.
…and that is an excuse since when?
It’s not an excuse, it doesn’t think or reason.
Unless the software owner sets the governing guardrails it cannot act or present or redact in the way a human can.
Then the software owner needs to be put in prison.