A DOGE employee signed an agreement to share Social Security data with the aim of overturning election results in certain states, according to a new court filing.
Access options:
- gift link — registration required
- archive.today
A DOGE employee signed an agreement to share Social Security data with the aim of overturning election results in certain states, according to a new court filing.
Access options:
Why should it be taken with a grain of salt?
I’m an experienced data scientist and have tangentially looked into and debated with others about ETA’s claims. Some of it is fine, but a lot of it is kinda weak. I actually went back and forth in a technical discussion with the guy who wrote this rebuttal to ETA’s claims: https://sullivan.zip/clark-county-election-analysis/
Ultimately, I concluded that a lot of ETA’s methods are reaching, but I still fully want a paper recount to put the issue to bed, and because of a ton reasons related to means, motives, and opportunities from the MAGA camp.