bestelbus22@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 4 days agoFor that modern web feelinglemmy.worldimagemessage-square41fedilinkarrow-up1346arrow-down13
arrow-up1343arrow-down1imageFor that modern web feelinglemmy.worldbestelbus22@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 4 days agomessage-square41fedilink
minus-squareVictor@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·4 days agoBut if the element itself already had an inline opacity value, that would be lost. 🙂
minus-squarebestelbus22@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 days agoYes very true, and also not likely at all ;)
minus-squareVictor@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 days agoNot in your code perhaps, which is a good thing 👍
But if the element itself already had an inline opacity value, that would be lost. 🙂
Yes very true, and also not likely at all ;)
Not in your code perhaps, which is a good thing 👍