• REDACTED@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Lol no. USSR by definition was not communist, only by it’s name. Look up what communism actually is. It has no central government for starters. This is why it’s hard for me to even refer to USSR as communists, they were a socialist state.

    The S in USSR is “Socialist”. You could say that Communism is the end goal (stateless, classless), and socialism is the transitional stage, but USSR never reached communism, they only had a party that called themselves communist party of socialist state

    • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Correct, which is why I am mocking the liberal who thinks socialism is European style social democracy and AES are evil oppressive places because “communist application of oppressive law”

      • stylusmobilus@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        liberal

        Don’t tag me with American pidgeonholes champion

        Communism is flawed because it is exploited easily by bad actors. Grow up and accept that.

        • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Socialism is about the power dynamic, rich people giving to charity isn’t socialism, nor is capital setting up a minimal welfare state to prevent a revolution, which capital then recinds as the threat is removed.

          You are not a socialist, you want to maintain the institution of capitaliam, that makes definitionly a liberal.

          Don’t tag me with American pidgeonholes

          This isn’t some weird American usage of liberal, this is the way its been used for 200 years or so.