• givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    19 hours ago

    No.

    You need the visceral emotional reaction.

    That’s definitely than logically understanding the abstract concept they murdered someone. That’s not new, but what happens in this video is new. It crosses the line in an inexplicable fashion and either enough people see it happen once in this video all at the same time, then we all wait to see it individually in person

    • JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      With respect, don’t tell me what I need based on what you need.

      I don’t need to see a thing to have an emotional reaction to it. I am not a child lacking object permanence.

      Being able to watch a dozen different angles of a person’s death in high definition isn’t necessary for everybody. Most murders have no footage, and empathy can still be experienced for them. Surely you also run the emotional gambit when you read of a school shooting, whether or not there is footage of the carnage, don’t you?

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago

        With respect, don’t tell me what I need based on what you need

        You don’t understand any of this, but if you were polite and asked questions I would have explained it and you’d have walked away from this with more knowledge than you had now.

        Think about who really lost in this exchange

        • JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Who really lost? You perceive this back and forth as something that can be won or lost? Both you and I are arguing semantics from behind screens, not out risking our life and limb. There are no winners here.