• Bytemeister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    19 days ago

    Gotcha. So if it is the first time, or maybe the second time, fuck you, pay for the damage someone else did to your car and their own car. Maybe on the 4th or 5th time, we can start getting the teen’s parents to pay for it?

      • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 days ago

        Yep. Un-parented teen burns down your house, shit happens.

        Another kid brings their dad’s gun to school and shoot your kid, shit happens.

        Kid has to steal food in order to survive. Shit happens.

        Clearly, the parents are completely beyond reproach.

        Seriously, do you even think of the wider implications of a position that you are arguing, or do you just pick the dumbest fucking stance and stick with it all the way? Parents have been raising their kids for literally as long as there have been people on this earth. It’s practically globally agreed upon that the parents are responsible for raising and controlling their child, until the child has developed enough to make their own decisons, understand the risks, and accept the consequences for their actions.

        And… To go further, your “world view” about “bad shit happens” can be extended to cover “My child saw porn, shit happens”, which would break down your argument that it is necessary for discord to collect and store PII from millions of people.

        • artyom@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          19 days ago

          Wow, that really escalated quickly from car damage. These are all crimes you can charge kids with just like adults. You cannot and should not charge their parents, who had abso-fuckin-lutely nothing to do with it. This is insane. Seriously, do you even think of the wider implications of a position that you are arguing, or do you just pick the dumbest fucking stance and stick with it all the way?

          And, to go further, we definitely shouldn’t have any laws about drinking, smoking, driving, getting tattoos, etc. We just leave it up to the parents to make those decisions too, right? We have to trust them all to make the right decisions and don’t bother making any rules or laws, right? 🤡

          • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            19 days ago

            You cannot and should not charge their parents, who had abso-fuckin-lutely nothing to do with it.

            https://apnews.com/article/james-crumbley-jennifer-crumbley-oxford-school-shooting-e5888f615c76c3b26153c34dc36d5436

            You cannot and should not charge their parents, who had abso-fuckin-lutely nothing to do with it.

            These two had “literally nothing” to do with it, and they were charged for it. It’s called Neglect.

            https://abcnews.com/US/parents-charged-manslaughter-boy-struck-car-gastonia-north-carolina/story?id=122500748

            And yes, if your kid commits crimes, then you can be fined and sued for it. You are responsible for the conduct of your child while your child is incapable of being responsible for themselves.

            Let’s not forget, by your framework of parental responsibility, if your unsupervised child sees porn on discord because they wandered into a community of people talking about porn… Tough shit, that’s life.

            • artyom@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              17 days ago

              Let’s do one more thing here to really test your conviction to this argument that discord should be photo-ID-ing it’s users

              Your entire comment is predicated on a position that I’ve already told you I do not hold, so good job on making a long and intentional strawman.

              It’s called Neglect

              Neglect is what I alluded to earlier by saying that you have to demonstrate a pattern of irresponsibility.

              And to be clear, by “cannot” I was not saying it’s impossible, I was saying it’s wrong.

              Drinking and driving can and do harm others.

              Social media and porn also can and do harm others.

              The age limits on smoking and also drinking, are there to prevent tobacco and alcohol vendors from hooking children on addictive substances.

              Yes, I’m aware of what the purpose of that law is. It sounds like, by your position, we shouldn’t have those laws, because that’s a parents’ responsibility. Is that correct? And if not, please elaborate on how that’s different.

              • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                17 days ago

                I’m sorry. I can’t speak with you further. Discussion could include references to material that is not appropriate for children. Please prove you are over 18 years old if you would like to continue this conversation.