Sorry but if you can’t make LLMs useful there is something wrong with you. The problwm with this whole system is that it’s very helpful and valuable to the average person, as well as experts.
I’m sorry I wish you were correct but this narrative that LLMs don’t work is false and bourne out of lack of experience or just flat out lies.
Lies will not defeat our very powerful opponents here, nor their massive and expensive weapons.
Pretending the enemy is useless when the opposite is true is just leaving yourself and your allies unprepared.
Medical help. Other than that, nothing that a local LLM couldn’t do.
Eventually I believe it’s going to result it worse care for the most people, but in the meantime, for some people it will mean early interventions. Maybe cure diseases… What humanity does from there I don’t care to guess because it will probably be worse.
Why are you so angry? I’m trying to determine if there’s actually a use for these text generators, and you first say “Sorry but if you can’t make LLMs useful there is something wrong with how you are using them.”, and then you refuse to actually explain what you’re using it for, instead making vague hand-wavey statements.
I didn’t say the don’t work. They’re just mainly useless.
For coding? Nice for quick prototyping, seeking alternate approaches or such. Real code? Rarely working and in the end you spend more time fixing stuff than it initially saved.
For everyday research? It’s helpful sometimes, but mostly plain wrong. That one sure isn’t inherent of LLM but the data it feeds on.
For what it’s great is translations, summarizing stuff or a nicer web search.
And my own locally run for the smart home. For that it’s a blast. Like “close gate, open front door, turn on all lights at 50% in a lush shade of green, and turn on the coffee machine”. Absolutely awesome.
But paying for that? And even like 30 moneyz? No way.
Don’t get me wrong, I fucking love all tech and LLMs are kinda a dream coming true. But it’s still not really there.
My last session with Claude ended in the “AI” giving up and asking ME how I solved it. Only to then admit my answer would be useless as it is forgotten anyway after that chat 😁
I have no political agenda and surely don’t lack experience. I don’t even see LLM as an enemy. I wish it was actually intelligent and really helpful/timesaving more than 50% of the time.
Not questioning generative powers for video or image or sound. They’re awesome there and totally timesaving and extremely helpful.
And I’d also argue that the “average person” to whom it is very helpful is easy to please with any answer to their everyday questions. Especially if presented in the usual asslicking way based on total and absolute confidence.
Yeah screw all those disabled people who benefit from it. We’ll just group them in with the other counterfactuals you have to ignore to maintain an opinion like yours.
I have no idea how disabled people have anything to do with the current quality of LLMs. I didn’t say it’s not helpful at all, i didn’t say it does not work. Can you americans just think in binary dimensions? Some people don’t have a political agenda and just see things like they are. Like I do. And to me, LLMs are 90% useless, 10% incredibly helpful.
Truth. I don’t support US tech either but their LLMs are state of the art and VERY useful… No point lying about it. I’m supporting Mistral.ai instead now. Their model is good enough for my use cases, and I’m hoping their recent reported uptick in users like myself helps fund the research and hardware to make them even more competitive.
Sorry but if you can’t make LLMs useful there is something wrong with you. The problwm with this whole system is that it’s very helpful and valuable to the average person, as well as experts.
I’m sorry I wish you were correct but this narrative that LLMs don’t work is false and bourne out of lack of experience or just flat out lies.
Lies will not defeat our very powerful opponents here, nor their massive and expensive weapons.
Pretending the enemy is useless when the opposite is true is just leaving yourself and your allies unprepared.
What is it that you find useful?
Medical help. Other than that, nothing that a local LLM couldn’t do.
Eventually I believe it’s going to result it worse care for the most people, but in the meantime, for some people it will mean early interventions. Maybe cure diseases… What humanity does from there I don’t care to guess because it will probably be worse.
What do you mean by “medical help”?
Go that way and keep going until you see the sign marked none of your fucking business.
Why are you so angry? I’m trying to determine if there’s actually a use for these text generators, and you first say “Sorry but if you can’t make LLMs useful there is something wrong with how you are using them.”, and then you refuse to actually explain what you’re using it for, instead making vague hand-wavey statements.
They are a tool, but some people use it as a replacement for actual knowledge, and take it as gospel. Its going to create a generation of idiots
I didn’t say the don’t work. They’re just mainly useless. For coding? Nice for quick prototyping, seeking alternate approaches or such. Real code? Rarely working and in the end you spend more time fixing stuff than it initially saved.
For everyday research? It’s helpful sometimes, but mostly plain wrong. That one sure isn’t inherent of LLM but the data it feeds on.
For what it’s great is translations, summarizing stuff or a nicer web search. And my own locally run for the smart home. For that it’s a blast. Like “close gate, open front door, turn on all lights at 50% in a lush shade of green, and turn on the coffee machine”. Absolutely awesome.
But paying for that? And even like 30 moneyz? No way. Don’t get me wrong, I fucking love all tech and LLMs are kinda a dream coming true. But it’s still not really there. My last session with Claude ended in the “AI” giving up and asking ME how I solved it. Only to then admit my answer would be useless as it is forgotten anyway after that chat 😁
I have no political agenda and surely don’t lack experience. I don’t even see LLM as an enemy. I wish it was actually intelligent and really helpful/timesaving more than 50% of the time.
Not questioning generative powers for video or image or sound. They’re awesome there and totally timesaving and extremely helpful.
And I’d also argue that the “average person” to whom it is very helpful is easy to please with any answer to their everyday questions. Especially if presented in the usual asslicking way based on total and absolute confidence.
Yeah screw all those disabled people who benefit from it. We’ll just group them in with the other counterfactuals you have to ignore to maintain an opinion like yours.
I have no idea how disabled people have anything to do with the current quality of LLMs. I didn’t say it’s not helpful at all, i didn’t say it does not work. Can you americans just think in binary dimensions? Some people don’t have a political agenda and just see things like they are. Like I do. And to me, LLMs are 90% useless, 10% incredibly helpful.
Truth. I don’t support US tech either but their LLMs are state of the art and VERY useful… No point lying about it. I’m supporting Mistral.ai instead now. Their model is good enough for my use cases, and I’m hoping their recent reported uptick in users like myself helps fund the research and hardware to make them even more competitive.