Newly released body camera footage further undermines the Trump administration’s efforts to falsely portray Marimar Martinez—who was shot multiple times by Border Patrol agent Charles Exum in October—as a “domestic terrorist.” Federal prosecutors shared three videos on Tuesday evening after a federal judge ruled last week that the footage and other evidence could be made public.

The videos released on Tuesday shed further light on why prosecutors dropped charges against Martinez rather than try to bring a case against her to trial.

The newly released evidence is also part of a pattern. It is one of many examples of DHS immigration agents lying and providing false information to justify shootings and other uses of excessive force against US citizens and immigrants. These claims have collapsed again and again once DHS is forced to defend them in court.

Martinez’s case follows this pattern. DHS initially claimed their force was justified because Border Patrol agents “were ambushed by domestic terrorists that rammed federal agents with their vehicles.” Once in court, evidence showed something much different. Like in the killings of Renee Good and Alex Pretti in Minneapolis, DHS might have gotten away with its false claims about Martinez were it not for the video evidence that contradicted its account.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=QDN2LZ7WcDM

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=LTnOPKm9WR8&pp=0gcJCUABo7VqN5tD

  • HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    52 minutes ago

    Showing something much different like her driving past them hitting her from side behind themselves and jumping out and shooting her from behind. Its so gangland its beyond belief. Clear traffic. No being “boxed in” although you hear the guy claim in on the cb while you clearly are seeing that is not the case.

  • Gates9@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 hours ago

    THIS IS WHAT DHS WAS DESIGNED TO BE.

    If you are in political conversations with people who are perhaps not as engaged as the people on this platform seem to be, ask them why a totally redundant agency with jurisdiction and authority that ALREADY EXISTED via FBI, CBP, Coast Guard, etc…Why was this created?

    It was created to put down dissent. Not just violent dissent. Soon they will be kicking down the doors of protest and labor organizers as well as transparency activists and journalists. This bullshit with tepid, milquetoast, lame ass Don Lemon is just the beginning.

    Soon they will be treating ALL dissent exactly the same way Russia does. That’s what the fucking camps are for.

  • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    DHS might have gotten away

    Well, their agents did get away with Assault With A Deadly Weapon (maybe even Attempted Murder) and Prejury, same as the ones who murdered Renee Good and Alex Pretti are getting away with Murder.

    Until the people involved stop getting away with it, they and their ilk will just keep on doing it.

    • D_C@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Well I’m sure someone with a spine will be along very soon to bring the orange kiddie fiddler and the other hobs to justice. Any minute now…

  • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    9 hours ago

    The newly released evidence is also part of a pattern. It is one of many examples of DHS immigration agents lying and providing false information to justify shootings and other uses of excessive force against US citizens and immigrants. These claims have collapsed again and again once DHS is forced to defend them in court.

    They are also part of another very disturbing pattern - in this case, Pretti, and Good’s there was a) evidence that the ICE/CBP agents recognized their victims as legal observers, b) evidence before and after the fact that the ICE/CBP agents were pissed off at these legal observers for doing that legally protected thing, c) no evidence that the agents had any reason to fear for their lives

    They got pissed at people questioning their authority and killed (or attempted to kill) them for it. That behavior absolutely must be publicly condemned and punished and an example needs to be made of all the agents who demonstrated it. We are not a free country in any meaningful sense until that happens.

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Sue and demand Kristi Noem’s firing for misconduct for intentionally lying about this case.

    • robocall@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Border patrol agent shot this woman. Not ICE. I’m not against abolishing ICE but don’t let CBP get away with this.

        • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          CBP does have legit purposes. I do enjoy having fentanyl laced imposter medicine blocked as much as possible from entering the country. I also enjoy not having invasive pests blocked from entering the country.k

          • hector@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            There is no reason CBP should be the ones to do this, it was created by Bush after 9/11, we didn’t need it, it’s very existence was on the wish list of the fascists that used 9/11 as an excuse to do all of those things, the Patriot Act was submitted like a week or two after the event, it’s over a thousand pages each referencing other laws it amends, it was already written. It was the wish list, and CBP was on that wish list.

  • Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Like in the killings of Renee Good and Alex Pretti in Minneapolis, DHS might have gotten away with its false claims about Martinez were it not for the video evidence that contradicted its account.

    Unless they are suffering (capital) punishment, they continue to get away with it.

    • bear@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      If there are no consequences for perjury and obstruction, courts need to expect this behavior. They’re also systematically ignoring federal court orders. This is a hostile regime and judges need to start treating it as such.

      • hector@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        What are the judges going to do? The scotus will cancel anything, and if not, the president will. The judges should still hold them in contempt, but it won’t change anything.

        Scotus really fucked us all when they disallowed nationwide injunctions from judges. That was a huge decision, that will allow the administration to mass round up citizens without habeous corpus and throw into camps/disappear them, with no way to stop them, and no way to get your day in court at all if they want let alone before irreperable harm is done.

        Scotus thinks the republic is dead.