So when scrolling my feed I can see the total comments and total new comments, for example 27 +19 (where the +19 is in green). Would it be possible to have those 19 new comments “marked” in some way so I can quickly scroll and identify them? Wouldn’t have to be flashy, maybe even just a green dot or something next to the commenter’s username, or some sort of different binding/italicizing to highlight it?
TIA!
You must log in or register to comment.
Currently, we are missing API support for this. Lemmy 1.0 (the upcoming version of Lemmy) includes this feature, so we’ll add support for it when Lemmy 1.0 is released :)
This was something I requested ages ago, however, unless it has been added since, there is nothing in the api for this. I have been meaning to add a feature request to piefed for the feature with api support. @wsj018@piefed.social
Can’t you track which posts (and when) people view locally, in your app? Then when displaying comments compare the comment time with the last-viewed-post time to determine if it’s new.
@wjs018@piefed.social
We could do, but ideally it would be implemented on the backend - some people use PieFed on both mobile and desktop, and storing the last read count locally wouldn’t carry over properly between clients. Lemmy 1.0 has backend support for this feature.
I’d like to survey our users on this to see how they feel about what they read being tracked in this way.
Some time ago I floated the idea of somehow highlighting/prioritizing comments by people who had clicked the link to the article. People who mouth off without reading the article are a pain in the ass so I wanted to somehow de-emphasize those. The feedback I got at the time was pretty strongly “no I don’t want you knowing what I read”. It’s too easy to do big data stuff on it to build profiles on people, I guess. It wasn’t a proper poll, just people commenting so it’s hard to know what the silent majority thinks.
So I’m a bit wary about it now.
If there was a
readAtdate for the post, we’d be able to highlight comments created since that date. I don’t think tracking areadAtdate is much different from tracking areadboolean, which you’re already doing. It could always be made opt-out, if people are concerned about it. Having the date that someone read a post isn’t as exploitable as the link click tracking you mention, I don’t think.Any suggestions for how to word the survey question? How it’s framed will make a big difference to the result.
@blaze@piefed.zip has been asking for this feature for ages and @Skavau@piefed.social made an issue for it on the codeberg already. The reason this isn’t in the api yet is because it isn’t anywhere in piefed yet. AFAIK, the read/unread status of comments isn’t currently tracked anywhere within piefed. Additionally, for this feature, I don’t believe we track the timestamp at which you do interact with a post…so doing something like calculating the number of new comments that have occurred since you last opened that post isn’t possible…yet.
I don’t have a great idea of how to do this in a db-efficient way. Keeping track of when every user opens each post sounds like db-query hell. However, there might be clever caching tricks to make it a bit less computationally intense. @rimu@piefed.social would likely have a better idea of how to do this.
Thanks for the info :) Lemmy 1.0 tracks a
readAttimestamp; maybe it’s worth looking at how they’re doing it.
