• hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        31 minutes ago

        Because he specifically argued in his divorce that he suffers cognitive impairment and therefore he projects less future earnings. So he himself basically argued he is not smart enough to earn even as much as the average guy.

        So in his own words, he has a cognitive impairment that will not go away. Now either you trust his advice (which assumes it’s good advice, and kinda goes against him saying under oath he will have cognitive impairment) or you think he was saying the truth under oath and now his advice is not worth too much.

        Basically you have to decide which version of his you wanna trust. And if I have to decide between “he is dumb” or “he lied under oath”, I know one thing for sure - and that is to be very skeptical of anything he says.

      • EtherWhack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I think they’re getting at that there is suspicion he caused it himself by doing things like drinking raw milk.