This seemed a little sus to me so I checked the dictionary. Merriam-Webster says wet can mean consisting of liquid such as water. (See 1a of screen capture).
That was actually what my initial response was going to be! Then I checked the definition and saw it wasn’t even necessary to argue at the molecular level.
This seemed a little sus to me so I checked the dictionary. Merriam-Webster says wet can mean consisting of liquid such as water. (See 1a of screen capture).
Also if two water molecules are next to each other then are they not making each other wet?
That was actually what my initial response was going to be! Then I checked the definition and saw it wasn’t even necessary to argue at the molecular level.
There go those slutty water molecules again
Hydrogen bonding with just any molecule they bump into. Those promiscuous polar particles.
Their so corrosive to the bonds of those around them, if only they’d think of other more