• silverneedle@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Spotify’s functions have not changed a bit since 2016. It is literally the same application, what has changed are the tiny things they’re doing for compatibility but that is not really worth mentioning. Intentionally leaving UX out.

    Honestly what code is there to write for this glorified web browser? They’re probably also outsourcing most of their data collection and recommendation algorithms.

    Buy physical media, rip CDs, share shit and that’s it

    • filcuk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      You are wrong on many points IMO.
      I’ve been using it for nearly a decade, it’s changed a lot.
      I don’t know why you’d be leaving ux out.
      What code is there to write? You must be trolling come on now.

      • silverneedle@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I’ve been using it for nearly a decade, it’s changed a lot. Same. I just simply don’t agree. If you consider tiny features not a soul needs like yearly reviews of one’s listening habits and the roll out of podcasts as things worth mentioning, ok, they were not exactly doing anything radically new at that point anyway. I don’t know why you’d be leaving ux out. Because UX 90% adds nothing and chiefly serves to suggest innovation. You must be trolling come on now. I am. I want Spotify employees to read this and get steamingly mad. They are complicit in ruining music.

    • merdaverse@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Like a lot of these big, consolidated, years long projects, the real work is maintenance. The rest is just a bunch of people desperately trying to improve obscure KPIs by 1%.

      Mark Fisher’s idea of market stalinism comes to mind

  • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Is that supposed to be impressive? Spotify is among the dumbest, shittiest apps. It’s literally just a music library player.

    Spotify doesn’t exist because it’s some genius app. It exists because of legal control. They have no reason to make the app better. Indeed their shitty capitalist motives continue to enshittify the app.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rent-seeking

  • FreddiesLantern@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Reads as: we here at Spotify are a bunch of naive and gullible halfwits who have diluted themselves into being proud of it.

  • banshee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Why would anyone think this is a good thing? You’re actively telling the world that your product is likely full of bugs and hard to maintain.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Or even to true believers, they can just vibe code up just as good of an app.

      It basically declares point blank that the technology does not matter, it’s their marketing and music rights only that matter.

  • darthinvidious@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 hours ago

    My first thought for the title is thinking it’s because they fired their best/most expensive developer and kept the AI baby sitters.

  • atfergs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    This sounds like such a fucking nightmare. I got into software because I like writing code. Their job is now the equivalent of a full time PR reviewer.

    • BaroqueW@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      PR reviewer but the dev was drunk, sometimes is a genius, sometimes is eating sand, doesn’t follow guidelines, likes to duplicate code, and forgets what was in the original task description after a while.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        And even if you babysit it and carefully tell it all the mistakes, it will learn nothing and suggest the same stupid mistakes next tim. I did actually know a human just like AI and he kept his job for years before quitting to grift another company because management refused to believe he sucked. So I’m not optimistic about AI screwing up discouraging business leaders.

  • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    Do you know what they call someone that doesn’t write code?

    Anything other than a “developer”.

    • zbyte64@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 hours ago

      A manager. This tool is for what managers think software development is: managing the production of code. From that perspective this hype makes a lot of sense, just turn all your current developers into managers with AI and you now have grown the team by 10x. You can go back in time and find many jokes about how adding more developers doesn’t speed up delivery but slows it down. I don’t see how AI would suddenly make that less true, especially since the AI is not accountable for its results, you are.

    • ToTheGraveMyLove@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Lmao, exactly. If you’re not writing the code you’re not the developer, the AI is the developer. Youre just another asshole who gets paid to do nothing.

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      This is spotify. It’s just a music player. The overwhelming bulk of the code was probably written like 20 years ago by a 15 year old.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Look at the feature list bragged about. It’s really simple stuff. I can absolutely believe they vibe coded that stuff.

      The “hardest” one was to feed listener history to an LLM and have it generate a playlist based on the titles. That’s such an absurdly trivial thing to do.

      It’s not rocket science. It’s a trivial streaming music player.

    • Skymt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      It’s quite possible they already fired their best developers