• Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 hours ago

    kinda like how youtube takes massive cut of ad revenue, which is why they switch to patreon, brand deal and promotions.

  • TheFonz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Timmy Cook is just a bean counter. He’s got nothing to innovate or build. That’s Apple has been buying back shares non stop. Their lead designer jumped ship a while ago. It’s only a matter of time.

  • Paranoidfactoid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Choose another payment method. Choose another platform - web based? - where these fees don’t apply. Hell, buy a throwaway droid phone to keep your money from apple’s greedy hands.

    • Scrollone@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Google imposes the same restriction, if you buy a digital service (such as a Patreon subscription) you need to pay the Google tax.

      I don’t know if Patreon got an exemption from Google, but any smaller developer doesn’t for sure.

  • lechekaflan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Makes me think why ever since Photoshop was first created, Apple became the go-to for creatives for decades, and now Apple thinks it wants more money than just the fanatics going after their latest product.

    • stellargmite@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Apple screwed their pro market anyway. Sometime back . The history with apple and creatives relates more to print history I’d guess . Adobe needs to be ditched , and is in some areas. Windows is a shitshow as we know. There are lessening reasons to be wedded to either Mac OS or Windows as they continue to enshittify and I for one welcome it.

  • Dewege@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    11 hours ago

    To follow this logic: if you use an e-banking app, Apple will soon claim to be entitled to 30% of all transactions. Same for paypal, ebay, you name it

    • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Apple charges 30% when you sell digital goods within an app. That’s not the same as moving money in your bank account or buying something on eBay.

      It’s still robbery, but it’s not the same.

  • Hawanja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Yet another reason to never ever use Apple. So if I just use the Patreon website and not an app, do I still have to give Apple 30% of my money? Seems like that should be illegal.

    • winkerjadams@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Thats exactly how it works for twitch and other stuff. If you’re on mobile go to the website instead of the app otherwise they take a cut

      • Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Many apps either only sell on website or just make it 30% more expensive when paid via app
        That is long the case

        • dil@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Same applies for steam games, you can usually get a discount going off game’s webstores compared to buying off steam if it’s an option

  • gaymer@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    10 hours ago

    People need to stop buying apple products. So many controversies and still people keep buying apple products. Its like people really dont care about ethics , environment and other human beings. Oh wait…

    • MortUS@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Right, the alternatives are sooooooooooo much better. Googles track record is on point , android for the win.

      Getting rid of Apple entirely would be like removing Coke from soda competitors. It just allows the competition to worsen and consumer choice to be less.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Just crank all iOS user payments up by 30%, explain why, and let nature sort itself out.

    • Tilgare@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Apple doesn’t allow this - they expect your price to be the same everywhere or they’ll remove the app from their store or decline version updates. There have historically been a few high profile exceptions privately negotiated, and I think they were forced to relax this in the last year or two, but here they are again trying to claw away money they did literally nothing to earn.

      • Spezi@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Instagram puts way more than 30% on their ads when purchasing through iOS

        If you buy 100€ of ad budget, they want you to pay an additional 42.5% apple service fee and additional taxes here in Germany.

        If I do it through their ad center suddenly the taxes are already included in the budget so if I pay 100€ I get 100€. So in the end, Meta charges iOS users an additional 70% vs what they usually charge.

      • Pyr@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I have an app which reduces the quality of the app for apple users to force them to subscribe more than Android users.

        The price is the same, but on android there’s no limit to the number of saves you can keep whereas Apple has a limit of 5 and you need to Subscribe at $30/year to unlock more saves.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      Patreon gives creators the option to either increase their prices in the iOS app only, or absorb the fee themselves, keeping prices the same across platforms.

      It’s already an option and if you read the article, only 4% are still on the legacy billing system (no Apple tax at all)

      iOS users using a browser don’t pay the Apple Tax. And the only reason to pay through the app is if you specifically want to use Apple Pay (e.g to pay with your phone bill instead of your credit card).

      At this point it’s a “stupid tax” more than anything.

      • mholiv@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Small clarification. Apple Pay is not really paying with your phone bill. I think you can but most users just have their credit card or debit card linked.

  • network_switch@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Terribly need degoogled android to become popular and/or a normal Linux distribution phone to become popular so that normal Linux market share couldn’t be ignored

  • madcaesar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I fucking hate mega corps. It’s never fucking enough… Ever… Apple has more money than some countries yet these assholes want ever more…

    Tax all these assholes into oblivion!

    • some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Right? You’d think Patreon could throw their weight against Apple, as this is clearly not in their best interest. Threaten to pull the app, and if Apple follows through, they get nothing. Alternatively, move payments entirely outside of the app and force Apple to either do something which is guaranteed to be extremely unpopular, or call their bluff.

      Apple may appear to swing the biggest dick here, but I am so disgusted by these weak companies just immediately bending over without a fight.

      Of course, it’s the creators who will be faced with hardship, but neither entity seems to give a shit.

      • ranzispa@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Is It better for patreon to lose 30% of income from Apple pay, or to have Apple users not being able to pay unless they open the webpage and pay from there? Is it better for them to remove the app altogether and have users on Apple forced to use it through the website?

        I’d imagine they’d lose quite a bit of subscriptions if they did that. Is that more or less than 30% is something I don’t know.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      You can already pay on the website. If you pay through Apple Pay and therefore pay the extra 30%, that’s kinda on you at this point.

      Cunt move by Apple, but the in-app purchase payment processing going through apple only rule has been there for a long ass time, Patreon got pretty lucky that they were given so much leeway for so long.