That still sounds misleading. He was not speaking for 16 hours of use which is what the headline suggests. As other has stated, I hope those companies crumble but I think honesty is important, not sensationalization.
I fear for the future of reading comprehension. The article gives people multiple paragraphs of context to understand addiction as what is being talked about. I don’t expect the word to be wedged into every sentence about the same topic.
But I do find it much more concerning that Analog appointed himself judge of bad articles, then either accidentally or intentionally omitted these multiple paragraphs.
That still sounds misleading. He was not speaking for 16 hours of use which is what the headline suggests. As other has stated, I hope those companies crumble but I think honesty is important, not sensationalization.
I fear for the future of reading comprehension. The article gives people multiple paragraphs of context to understand addiction as what is being talked about. I don’t expect the word to be wedged into every sentence about the same topic.
But I do find it much more concerning that Analog appointed himself judge of bad articles, then either accidentally or intentionally omitted these multiple paragraphs.
I fear for it currently if you think it’s okay to make up things people said and put it in a headline.