Self-driving cars are often marketed as safer than human drivers, but new data suggests that may not always be the case.

Citing data from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Electrek reports that Tesla disclosed five new crashes involving its robotaxi fleet in Austin. The new data raises concerns about how safe Tesla’s systems really are compared to the average driver.

The incidents included a collision with a fixed object at 17 miles per hour, a crash with a bus while the Tesla vehicle was stopped, a crash with a truck at four miles per hour, and two cases where Tesla vehicles backed into fixed objects at low speeds.

  • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Are they even insured like typical insurance?

    If Tesla owns it, don’t they just pay out of pocket as needed, they don’t actually have a monthly payment to themselves or anything?

    • copd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      There’s no way, then why can’t I drive around “uninsured” with thr promise I’ll pay out of my pocket for any damage.

        • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          This is what I was thinking was possible ya. If they have enough money, they could just cover it themselves.

          I really don’t know if that can be done everywhere though.

          And ya, as an individual self insuring this way, it would be a disaster going against a behemoth like Tesla.

      • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        17 hours ago

        What auto insurance company would insure an unproven tech like this at a reasonable rate?

        If someones willing to insure it, it must cost an arm and a leg at least at this point in time in the cycle?