• angrywaffle@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I’m desperate for a community driven review system for open source. We’re drowning in vibe-coded slop, and I honestly don’t have the time or a good slop detector to audit every tool I download. I know I should be checking under the hood, but the sheer volume of low-quality projects makes it impossible to keep up

    • partofthevoice@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      37 minutes ago

      Sounds like the solution would be a public code sharing platform that specifically bans AI generated code. Then, at least, we’re moving in the right direction. Do any alts to GitHub provide such a rule?

    • currycourier@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I saw a project yesterday where the two main contributors were some guy and ‘Claude’. So, y’know, that one at least was an easy tell 😂

    • SayCyberOnceMore@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      You’re here, that’s a good start…

      I tend to look at a project’s Issues tracker, that gives me a feel for how the author(s) deal with feedback… some projects have hundreds of open tickets with barely any interactions, yet code updates “2 days ago”.

      Being here and reading about who’s using what will help remove the major outliers

      All opensource needs more eyeballs, which is still the advantage over closed source.

    • Trilogy3452@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Sometimes it’s really easy, open a bunch of code files and see if it’s littered witb comments. If it is: likely sloppified