• rainwall@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    Good catch. I should have said smart phones. Cellphones were around, but think calls/basic texting, no cameras, no internet, no GPS.

    Myspace launched in 2003, so it didnt exist. Friendster technically did, as it looks like it launced in march, 2002. Id still say that no, there was no social media of note in 2002, unless you want to talk about usenet/IRC.

    • raef@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      29 days ago

      You keep dating yourself. You must not have been around then. Phones did have cameras in 2002. They were shit, but they were there. I think GPS started creeping into phones in the 1990s already

        • raef@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          29 days ago

          I did not mash anything together. I was around then. Nokia did not innovate cameras or GPS, so it’s a useless example. In fact, I never even owned one: Motorola, Kyocera, Panosonic… Yes, it’s almost impossible to get lost nowdays and it’s different than it was then. I do not disagree with your main sentiment, just the categorical portrayals

          • rainwall@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            29 days ago

            So you owned an uncommon phone with uncommon features in 2002, and youre using this to assert that these features were common at the time?

            At a time when only 20-30% of people had cellphones, having one of the 5% of those cellphones with a camera or GPS was pretty uncommon. It means at any given point, less than 1% of people would be able to take your picture, much less post it to the “nowhere” that was social media at the time.