I was reading it as, “now this dress has the capacity to have had boy cooties on it” which I would have thought, in my limited frame of reference, that would make the dress more gross and perhaps at the very least less desirable for those who are inquiring enough to care about “who has worn this before me”. but I guess if you think about it from the perspective of pulling it off, wearing it well and it fitting their personal taste well for the “first time for that dress”, for whatever that’s worth could be the other interpretation which could reasonably be something I could see someone being excited about
… Unless he transitioned before going to prom? Or maybe considers himself as always having been male before formally transitioning?
She was trying to be kind and inclusive. No need to grumpily look down on her because “uhm actually”.
I was reading it as, “now this dress has the capacity to have had boy cooties on it” which I would have thought, in my limited frame of reference, that would make the dress more gross and perhaps at the very least less desirable for those who are inquiring enough to care about “who has worn this before me”. but I guess if you think about it from the perspective of pulling it off, wearing it well and it fitting their personal taste well for the “first time for that dress”, for whatever that’s worth could be the other interpretation which could reasonably be something I could see someone being excited about
What the hell are boy cooties. Who says that past like 10 years old.
Duh everyone would wash a secondhand item of clothing before wearing it.
You don’t need to phrase yourself as if you’re submitting a dissertation.
1
What the fuck are you on about?