• lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    26 days ago

    What kind of strawman is this? You can intimidate people without doing it the obvious illegal way.

    And then, you cherry pick some countries…

    You know that you can just accept negative facts about China although you are on an ml instance??

    • QinShiHuangsShlong@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      26 days ago

      You know that you can just accept negative facts about China although you are on an ml instance??

      If you look through my profile you’ll see I do this often. But this bullshit about global intimidation is not a fact, it’s a fantasy.

      You can intimidate people without doing it the obvious illegal way. And then, you cherry pick some countries…

      I picked those countries because specifically they have laws making intimidation a crime and they found no evidence.

        • QinShiHuangsShlong@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          26 days ago

          No that’s a border dispute. Pretty much every country has them. And it’s completely unrelated to the point at hand about a global intimidation ring targeting individuals. Nice try with the false equivalence tho 2 or 3 more debate bro tactics and you might catch me out on some asinine technicality so you can declare yourself winner despite being factually wrong.