After Anthropic refused flat out to agree to apply Claude AI to autonomous weapons and mass surveillance of American citizens, OpenAI jumps right into bed with the United States Department of War.
Show me where the contracts differ. OpenAI says they don’t. Unless Dario Amodei speaks up, why assume they do?
I’ve shown you plenty of stuff that should make you hate Dario Amodei. Unless you support the current state of the US military as much as he does, I don’t know why you are defending the pro-Trump pro-war suckup.
The DoW offered Anthropic the contract and they declined, as it has clauses that would allow the government to do whatever they wanted.
Then OpenAI signed the same contract.
How can you say they are the same, when the first company refused the contract? I’m not even from the US and definitely not pro Trump. But there’s things besides black and white.
Just calm down, I’m not pro AI, but we can still be positive about someone making the right choice for once.
Throwing enough money around there’s plenty of other options for the DoW, be it Microsoft, Google or even hosting their own LLM (open source models are pretty much on-par now).
You don’t have to praise the “fair” and “just capitalism” qualities of 99% Hitler when you can choose 0% Hitler.
I’ll change my statement: Iraq, not Iran. Will you change yours: Dario is a warmonger who wants to enable Trump and Hegseth and continued to do so? You didn’t contest that.
I honestly care less about the war mongering and more about the “domestic surveillance” part. Like domestic just counts for US citizens, which I’m not. So fuck him too (:
Show me where the contracts differ. OpenAI says they don’t. Unless Dario Amodei speaks up, why assume they do?
I’ve shown you plenty of stuff that should make you hate Dario Amodei. Unless you support the current state of the US military as much as he does, I don’t know why you are defending the pro-Trump pro-war suckup.
Okay, so listen:
The DoW offered Anthropic the contract and they declined, as it has clauses that would allow the government to do whatever they wanted.
Then OpenAI signed the same contract.
How can you say they are the same, when the first company refused the contract? I’m not even from the US and definitely not pro Trump. But there’s things besides black and white.
Okay, so listen.
OpenAI claims they have the same standards as Anthropic. OpenAI signed the deal, even reiterated they have the same joke of “red lines.”
Can you show me the difference between the old contract and the new one? Because if you can’t, you’re making assumptions.
Presuming your making assumptions, riddle me this: is Sam Altman a liar?
Presuming Sam Altman isn’t a liar: Why isn’t pro-war Dario Amodei calling him on it?
Dario Amodei is busy calling out the pile of shit that’s the US government. Fighting Altman doesn’t get him anything right now.
https://www.anthropic.com/news/statement-comments-secretary-war
Dario Amodei is happily complicit in the bombings of Venezuelan fishermen and the kidnapping of President Maduro apparently.
They crave blood so badly.
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/2/28/what-countries-has-trump-attacked-since-returning-to-office
It’s Iran, not Iraq.
Just calm down, I’m not pro AI, but we can still be positive about someone making the right choice for once.
Throwing enough money around there’s plenty of other options for the DoW, be it Microsoft, Google or even hosting their own LLM (open source models are pretty much on-par now).
You do not, in fact, have to hand it to him?
You don’t have to praise the “fair” and “just capitalism” qualities of 99% Hitler when you can choose 0% Hitler.
I’ll change my statement: Iraq, not Iran. Will you change yours: Dario is a warmonger who wants to enable Trump and Hegseth and continued to do so? You didn’t contest that.
I honestly care less about the war mongering and more about the “domestic surveillance” part. Like domestic just counts for US citizens, which I’m not. So fuck him too (: