• TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    They literally posted an article supporting the war earlier today, too.

    The NYT is part of the US’s consent manufacturing machine.

    They just also coincidentally post some decent recipes and host some fun word games.

        • Photonic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Link didn’t work for me but I found it through the Bret comment below. I don’t know the guy – but now I read the article I remember reading something from him before, and looking him up on wiki because I thought “WTF NYT?!”. I guess he is the voice of conservatism / MAGA in the NYT. So yeah, it’s rather strange that they would allow a voice like that in their newspaper, but I guess that’s the journalists’ compulsion to show both sides of a story even if one side of that story smells rotten AF.

          That being said: the Irani regime is horrible and they have been killing their citizens for weeks now and have been suppressing them for much longer. Thousands of innocents are dead. Something clearly had to be done to stop the bloodshed.

          If it were anyone other than these two old war criminals attacking the Irani regime, I would support it as well. But of course the issue is that these old farts are using it as an excuse to increase their power in the Middle East.

          Europe should have stepped up their game, but as always, they were as slow as a constipated turd moving through a rectum. And now it’s too late.

    • criticon@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I like the NYT journalism but their opinion pieces are all over the place, they always seem to go for the two sides, or even more sides so there’ll always be at least one you agree with and one that you absolutely hate