You reply to the international criminal court and the Ukrainian state with random blog as if your information are somewhat more reliable. Nothing is debunked we have thousands of names and first hand testimony. This is ridiculous; explain to me what is the process you are using to establish truth. It is definitely flawed
Probably to my comment with links, i don’t feel the need to respond to such a thought terminating cliche although it’s very funny that they accidentally answered to their own drivel with that.
Correct, it was your comment with link. What is making it a thought terminating cliche? Your links are not a reliable source of information. You inform yourself using false data and claim it as reality. How can you make a proper determination on what is real using such sources?
You reply to the international criminal court and the Ukrainian state with random blog as if your information are somewhat more reliable. Nothing is debunked we have thousands of names and first hand testimony. This is ridiculous; explain to me what is the process you are using to establish truth. It is definitely flawed
Which comment was this intended as a reply to?
Probably to my comment with links, i don’t feel the need to respond to such a thought terminating cliche although it’s very funny that they accidentally answered to their own drivel with that.
Correct, it was your comment with link. What is making it a thought terminating cliche? Your links are not a reliable source of information. You inform yourself using false data and claim it as reality. How can you make a proper determination on what is real using such sources?
You seem to be incredibly mad that your old and debunked propaganda is old and debunked.