Parents and teachers who oppose the state policies sued, claiming their parental, free speech and religious rights were violated.

The Supreme Court on Monday barred California from enforcing state rules that restrict when schools can notify parents about students who come out as transgender and requires teachers to use children’s preferred pronouns.

The court, on a 6-3 vote on ideological lines, allowed a federal judge’s ruling in favor of parents who oppose the policy on religious grounds to go into effect. The San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals had put the judge’s decision on hold pending further litigation.

The court’s ruling focused on the parents’ claim that their rights under the free exercise clause of the Constitution’s First Amendment were violated. The court also said they have valid parental rights claims under the Constitution’s 14th Amendment.

  • firelight@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    20 hours ago

    What’s the problem here?

    Schools shouldn’t be allowed to keep important information about students from their parents or legal guardians.

    • Famko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Unless the kids come from an abusive household where being gay or trans would be considered ‘sinful’ behavior so the kids don’t want to come out to their parents in any way.

      And then the schools will narc on them.

        • cutemarshmallow@europe.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Shouldn’t it be left in the hands of those most affected, the students involved? Why are we letting older people decide if their personal information should be forcibly shared or not? Most of them are capable of knowing the gravity of their parents’ knowing, or at least they know if their parents would be supportive or not. I would ask the student, “Do you agree with me informing your parents about this and discussing it together?” Most of them would probably say no, and that’s okay.

          • firelight@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            13
            ·
            19 hours ago

            Shouldn’t it be left in the hands of those most affected, the students involved?

            You tell me. Children aren’t equipped to make the best decisions for themselves, which is why they don’t have the same freedoms afforded to adults.

            • cutemarshmallow@europe.pub
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              18 hours ago

              Neither are the school staff and the government though. Ultimately, the students know their parents more than the others. It’s not necessarily about what is best for them, but what is the safest for them. We can’t assume the parents want the best for their children; some parents want the best for themselves or their god before their children’s interests.

              (This of course given that students shall be provided mental health and professional care, not just left to wander this new phenomenon alone)

              • firelight@startrek.website
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                11
                ·
                18 hours ago

                Faculty are better equipped than children to decide what’s best for the children, which is why they are trusted to make those decisions every day.

                How do you determine when children get to decide what’s best for themselves instead of adults?

    • Spacehooks@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Honor killings and similar behavior such a conversion camps put the child at risk. Which means the school actively endangered the child.