• aesthelete@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    So it’s not software that doesn’t work but hardware that’s weird then? Sure, makes sense.

    Next time you buy hardware look it up. Once you’re on stuff that’ll work in Linux you should be able to jump over easily then.

    • joelfromaus@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      So it’s not software that doesn’t work but hardware that’s weird then? Sure, makes sense.

      It’s a gaming mouse (I’m guessing you’re unfamiliar) with customisable buttons. The buttons work best with the software and the software doesn’t work natively on Linux, as previously mentioned.

      I wish Linux was seamlessly transitionable but you seem to be saying that I should change to suit Linux. The “you’re holding it wrong” of open source software.

      • aesthelete@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        The “you’re holding it wrong” of open source software.

        Eh, not really dude. Linux cannot possibly account for each and every unique hardware combination that is put to market – some of which are being invented as I type this sentence.

        Some hardware is written with firmware that falls outside of standards and specs and some hardware producers are actively hostile to people providing support for their hardware on alternative platforms. Computer hardware and peripherals are a huge market with lots of players. I’m saying if Linux support is important to you, then make it part of your evaluation criteria when you buy new hardware. Or don’t if it isn’t.

        Linux doesn’t have significant enough consumer market share to pressure hardware manufacturers into providing support for them, and it also is a free operating system – not one helmed by a massive multi-national corporation that can use billions of dollars to pressure hardware manufacturers into following their whims.