The U.S.S. Discovery Spore drive, is it complete nonsense or is there a scientific theory I’m unaware of?

  • Ikon@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    I was not saying that the warp drive was based on the Alcubierre drive. My pont was that the warp drive was more grounded in physics than the spore drive, so much so that it inspired the Alcubierre drive.

      • Ikon@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        I’ll go ahead and concede my point. I haven’t watched enough original Star Trek and definitely dont have enough knowledge in physics to argue this further. My understanding was that the warp drive was kept just vague enough to be argued to be theoretically possible. But honestly, I’m not a physicist, so I am probably missing something obvious.

        • T156@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          In the original Star Trek, that Alcubierre was inspired by, it wasn’t explained at all. You just had warp engines and impulse engines. Warp engines made it so the ship could go at warp speed, but go too fast, and they could come off the ship, or the ship would explode.

          It was later series that tried to have an explanation for how they worked.

          Although I don’t think the writers cared particularly much for whether they were theoretically possible or not, anyway. They work through subspace, and that doesn’t exist in reality, so a lot of oddities could just be brushed under that.