• lime!@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        9 hours ago

        ex-apologist. he’s gone on record saying that his statements were based on ignorance and that he had talked to a child psychologist to learn more.

          • pmk@piefed.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 hours ago

            That if someone freely gives consent but is underage, it’s not immoral.

            • ulterno@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 hours ago

              Ahh right.
              Perhaps he didn’t consider the kinds of mind games people can play on kids (which even other kids can), which you don’t need to worry about if you are just a random guy, but do need to, if you are controlling a community/country.

              • lime!@feddit.nu
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                8 hours ago

                my theory is that he simply assumes nothing bad will happen from any situation until someone tells him otherwise. i will give him this though, he instantly changes his opinion when presented with new data.

                • ulterno@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  7 hours ago

                  Honestly, I too had similar thoughts ~ a decade ago.
                  But then I looked back at my childhood, realised how much of a fool I was and how many times I was manipulated and understood how that could have worked in this context.