You have to draw the line somewhere, and personally I’m happy with childlike sex dolls being on the other side of that line same with AI generated CSAM, there doesn’t need to be a victim for it to be disgusting.
Are you seriously going to dodge every single hole people have poked in your flawed reasoning by redirecting attention to the person themselves - questioning their moral purity or hidden motives? Because that’s literally all you’ve done here so far.
Some disgusting things are quite legal. And have real victims.
I’m not sure why you would focus on illegalizing something disgusting that’s victimless.
edit: Your reply is my first sentence but with unnecessary verbosity. My first sentence is not an argument it’s a statement of fact. My second sentence is supporting that initial fact with another fact.
I express why I’m not sure why you’d focus on the (il)legalization and then you reply into exactly that and don’t seem to care anything at all about the victims.
You have to draw the line somewhere, and personally I’m happy with childlike sex dolls being on the other side of that line same with AI generated CSAM, there doesn’t need to be a victim for it to be disgusting.
Disgusting for sure but thats a really bad argument to make something illegal. It’s the same rhetoric used to ban queer sexualities.
The generative ai is often based on real stuff and regularly ends up being deepfakes of real people who are affected, thats not victimless.
That’s the main justification for banning homosexuality as well.
While true, adults can consent, children cannot.
Not a single person here is advocating for having sex with kids.
Are you seriously comparing pedophilia with homosexuality?
You seriously need to take a good look at your life dude.
Are you seriously going to dodge every single hole people have poked in your flawed reasoning by redirecting attention to the person themselves - questioning their moral purity or hidden motives? Because that’s literally all you’ve done here so far.
Some disgusting things are quite legal. And have real victims.
I’m not sure why you would focus on illegalizing something disgusting that’s victimless.
edit: Your reply is my first sentence but with unnecessary verbosity. My first sentence is not an argument it’s a statement of fact. My second sentence is supporting that initial fact with another fact.
I express why I’m not sure why you’d focus on the (il)legalization and then you reply into exactly that and don’t seem to care anything at all about the victims.
Sad.
“there are worse things that are legal” is a pretty terrible argument.