It gets my goat that people think it’s a good option. There are plenty of articles explaining some of the many issues with it, but a few are:

  1. It’s run by anti-LGBTQ+ crypto bros.
  2. It has ads right out of the box.
  3. It collected donations towards people who never signed up for them - then held them to ransom in exchange for the kind of information you should never share on the Internet.
  4. They’re a for-profit advertising company. “Privacy-centric” my elbow.
  • Mikina@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 days ago

    It’s a for profit ad company making a “privacy first browser”.

    Thinking for literaly a second about that sentence should tell you all you need to know.

    • Electricd@lemmybefree.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      you can do privacy friendly ads, it’s not because the entire industry has evolved to an horrible point that the good way of doing it can’t exist

    • jimmy90@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      it’s the best browser out there right now. did you know it has the TOR net and ad blocking built in? great huh?

      where does firefox make its money

      IS IT FROM GOOGLE SEARCHES?

      so what have the owners done to the lgbtq+ community in the last 5 years?